Friday, December 9, 2016

Demonetisation & Me




मैं और demonetisation अक्सर ये बाते करते हैं
की अगर तुम ना होते तो ऐसा होता
अगर तुम ना होते तो वैसा होता  

I was playing baddy when I came to know about this move of “Demonetisation” and since then this has remained a buzz word for me.  I missed the opportunity to listen to PM at 2000 hrs but was instantaneously convinced by this idea.
Though I was supporting the idea but had a situation to manage as a function was planned on 13th with estimated expense of 30 K. I had no cash available and  could not see any source to arrange new currency in 5 days. But thanks to the caterer and the decorator, who were considerate enough to provide me credit period of 10 days, by then I managed some cash and rest was transferred online. Snehal endured 3 hours long que to get cash on 10th or 11th day and it was definitely not easy for her.

Despite experiencing trouble myself and seeing many other issues arising out of demonetisation, I will still on board. Many will call it as a “Bhakt-Syndrome” or “Blind following” etc, but to me it was simply an interesting game changing attempt by CEO of India Inc. I liked it mostly because I felt it was a curious business decision to take-on the rivals with a surprise. Certainly a-lot of things were put at risk by PM and only time will prove how much premium he gets as a return.

As mentioned by PM, it is an attempt to counter “Black money” but there are many other benefits of the move kept mostly as a back up or Plan B (one can not open all his cards at the beginning itself and this ambiguity is a key for such decisions). The other benefits as per me could be /are
                          a)   Ruling out fake currency
                 b)  Make accumulated funds of Naxlites and terrorists worthless
                           c)  Push for cashless
               d)  Financial gain due to wind fall gain for RBI
                e) Revoking of BPL status for many
                f) Infusion of liquidity to the Banks
On the 31st day of demonetisation drive a,b,c,e & f of the above have been accomplished while d appears to be failing miserably and black money also has not been realised to a great extent. But this is still a early judgment as IT scrutiny of the accounts and the raids are continuing. Unless and until the complete balance sheet is settled , it is not right to stamp “Demonetisation” as failure or success.

But there were few other gains too 
                     a)  Opening of Jan Dhan accounts for Tea workers ~ 20 lac, 
                                 these were not opened in the mass drive.
                                               b)  Activation and utilisation of idle Jan dhan accounts
                                               c)  Reduction in Stone pelting incidences in J&K.
There are few or many more like this which can’t be monetised to gauge the benefits.
Now coming to the pain or hardship part of the decision, yes I do sympathies with those who have suffered and agree that it was at no fault of theirs. But as mentioned above it is a part of a decision.
Each decision has its pro’s and con’s, hence this step can’t be any different. GOI was made to put on a very slippery turf and they were reacting to the situation to best of their abilities.

Could it have been better?
Yes there is always a better way for everything but its easy to say this in hindsight. Response was fast and innovative too.
a)      Cash withdrawal from petrol pumps/ big bazaar
b)      Wedding card based additional money withdrawal
c)       Seeds for Farmers with old notes
These were evolving as per the realized needs and to offer ease to maximum junta and now it can be claimed that it would have been done in a better way.
One never fails; he either wins or learns in any of the endeavors...

My prediction is that even after 30th Dec, there will be restriction on the cash transaction and it will be pushed for cashless transactions.
No doubt GDP will shrink for a quarter or so but this will bounce back soon.
Note: I have deliberately not touched the sad demises of people due to hassles of demonetisation, full sympathy with them and their families.

3 comments:

Unknown said...

You are right Saurabh Sir. However I am sorry to say that if you consider youth as a whole, the number of young people strengthening their determination to leave the country as an aftereffect of this enter fiasco is far more than the number of guys who will say 'Hail Modi' and stay back in India. After all the present situation is forcing people to choose 'comfort' over 'patriotism'.

N you didn't touch upon the collateral damages - death alone is an extreme, I would have myself fainted SEEING the ATM queue.

The point is that is it necessary for normal working class people to suffer for a decision that PM takes to curb down black money? Please realise that this move is targeting the 'middle' and 'upper-middle' section of society. The actual black money holders have not lost a penny.

Saurabh said...

"the number of young people strengthening their determination to leave the country as an aftereffect of this enter fiasco is far more than the number of guys who will say 'Hail Modi' and stay back in India"
Completely difficult to buy this argument as the number is very small and personally if one decides to take such step he is running away nothing else.
This is a phase and there are restrictions on the cash transactions only, no bar on usage of cheques/electronic transfers/cards. Hence "Youth" who can decide to go abroad should able enough use this modes instead of the conventional cash.
If they can not do this then they are not able to meet the inbuilt prerequisite of abroad which are cashless countries.

I deliberately did not touch on deaths as it is a sensitive topic for debate and personally feel that cause and effects have not been well established for this.
Demonetisation is a nation wide impacting event so it will have some demerits for sure.
Since you mentioned the ques, why there were so much ques because rather than letting a needy one get chance everyone wanted to have cash rather than showing restrain.

As already mentioned in my blog the even might not have got black money but there are other gains too and this argument of why X should suffer when Y is roaming free is a Chicken and egg syndrome. This is a precedence set for a transparency cause, looking it as an individual root cause will not serve the purpose.
I feel it is a war so it some demerits are bound to be there.







Link :
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-08-28/wealth/65969493_1_north-india-credila-students

Unknown said...

Saurabh sir:
I find your argument of cashless countries a bit conflicting. That is because in cashless countries, everyone knows how to run cashless, everyone across the strata of the society. Now, in India thats not the case, youth knows how to run cashless, but if u are say in the airport and you are not finding an Ola/Uber, how do u return home in a normal taxi?Can you pay using paytm or ola money? Does your can driver even know how to use a smartphone?
So the point is that, cashless countries..things are different, system itself is cashless.. it is a process that happened over a time.
In India, system is not cashless, people are.... Thats the difference, One cannot force a country into becoming cashless over a period of a month.